I'm good

Feeling that you are makes you feel that you have nothing to worry about, whatever you ignore will not affect you because you are good, innocent in the most explicit sense of its meaning, so you are not guilty of anything. 

The question is, what do we base ourselves on to be good? 

Usually people have their perspectives on what it means to be good, for example, being generous, kind, and also mean to those who deserve it. Another way of being good is to deceive the deceiver, take advantage of those who are unable to see through your lies, and even cause suffering because that person believes that is good. 

Therefore, being good for someone based on their own preferences, philosophies and social agreements will be relative and you can never be good because no one can be good by definition, being good implies existing as such, as no one knows what it is to be good within the context of existing by ourselves, circumstantially, then no one is good in its most explicit sense. 

If all people agreed on what is good and bad, that would be called law, but this law is different in every country, so people never agree. 

So are you good or do you think you are? 

To really answer that question you need to know your origin. 

If we are the result of a circumstantial process, that is to say that life exists by itself, being good as most people consider it to be, will be enough to make others be close to you and that in effect even if you ignore many things, you are good and that allows you not to be guilty of any bad act, but what is being bad? 

In order not to get tangled up in the above (because we still do not know if we are the result of a circumstantial process), here comes the other side of the coin, if life was created instead, knowing what it is to be good is not the power of any human being, but of the creator himself who perhaps teaches people to know what it is to be good in every sense, and who puts that knowledge inside them, called cons-ciousness = with-knowledge so that he knows at least the essence of being good. 

The question is which of these examples is the truth? 

If you assume you're good based on the first example, will that example be true? And will you really be good? 

If you assume you're good according to the other example, will that example be true? And will you really be as good as the Creator taught?

 These are questions that you have to know the answer to definitively, because if it turns out that the first one is true, you have nothing to worry about, but if it turns out to be the other example and you live accepting what was not true, then you will be on a path of destruction that you do not know what will happen because you even assume that your own way of being good is pleasing to the creator, but is there a way to know if it is true? 

This is why feeling that you are good cannot yet be true. To do this, you need to know the real answer on which that position is based. When you know it deeply, that is when you will truly be able to know if you were good. 

And in the network of everything there is the answer, it is mentioned in the next course, so do not think that believing yourself to be good at whatever you base it on, prevents you from honestly discovering the network of everything, good people are honest, therefore you do not have to fear finding the real answer to the examples mentioned.